2/28/2024 0 Comments Licecap blocky animation![]() ![]() Well, technically, an image using all colors available in a 16-bit color scheme would need 257 images – you only get 255 colors in each image, since you need transparency in all but the rear-most image. Just food for though, either way it’s not something I’m all that bothered about. The problem is if we start adding all these things to CSS standards, it will become increasingly bloated with user needs that arguably might be best left to the browsers & plugins rather than CSS after all. This specific feature seems like a minor change, but where do we draw the line with using CSS to implement local user preferences? We could conceivably allow a user to adjust the playback speed, enable/disable OCR, audio equalization, codec parameters, language selection, speech to text closed captioning, etc. All major browsers have some way (often deeply hidden) to force loading a custom CSS file after loading all the CSS from the page itself, which lets you do pretty much whatever the hell you want with the page because the last loaded rules override earlier rules.Īccessibility mandates that there still needs to be a browser setting/plugin in order for normal people to use it since messing with CSS is a non-starter for them.ĬSS styles shouldn’t be format specific, so would a CSS animation-blocker flag apply to other formats too? I still dislike the use case where a website would make a user download potentially thousands of frames only to inhibit them in the browser using CSS. It’s inherently designed to allow user choice. Except you’re forgetting the C in CSS, which stands for ‘Cascading’.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |